What is it?
If ever there used to be a automotive that demonstrates converting developments within the automotive trade, it’s the Citroën C3 Aircross.
In its previous existence, it used to be the C3 Picasso: a characterful small MPV. But seeing as no person in reality buys MPVs to any extent further, Citroën changed it with a small SUV: the C3 Aircross.
The C3 Aircross joins an ever-growing collection of small SUVs just like the Kia Stonic, Seat Arona, Vauxhall Crossland X and, after all, the genre-defining Nissan Juke. It’s additionally some other that starts to blur the traces between high-riding hatch and SUV, such is ceaselessly the subtlety of the area of interest.
The C3 Aircross joins the Peugeot 3008 and Vauxhall Crossland X because the PSA Group’s maximum style-oriented small SUV, with the Crossland X taking a look moderately staid and the Peugeot 3008 relatively grown up subsequent to the quirky, vibrant Aircross.
What’s it like?
On the outdoor, it seems a laugh. On the interior, it seems a laugh. To pressure, it’s now not buckets of a laugh.
Let’s spoil it down – the engine is just right. PSA’s 1.2-litre, turbocharged three-cylinder engine pulls smartly from any pace with its 128bhp and 151lb toes – it’s sprightly and makes the auto really feel extra excitable and perky, with a satisfyingly linear supply of energy. The harsh, raspy engine notice isn’t the ultimate in refinement, even though, and provides useless noise to the cabin.
That turns into somewhat of a cacophony at toll road speeds and on rougher roads – there’s a good bit of wind and highway noise. At least the trip settles down at the ones speeds, after being a coloration at the fidgety facet on commonplace roads.
It’s inoffensive to pressure, anodyne even, which right here isn’t a just right factor: the guidance is remarkably numb, and makes you are feeling somewhat far flung from the street – somewhat of a distinction to the over-stiff suspension.
Unusually, going for the automated gearbox makes the guidance relatively worse – weighting it up spongily and taking out what (very) little comments there used to be initially. Stick with the handbook – it’s extra at house within the dinky Aircross.
Then there’s the internal. It seems a laugh and avant-garde, with attention-grabbing main points splattered concerning the cabin, fashion-forward materials on higher trims and an altogether upbeat way, the place opponents just like the Kia Stonic are a little bit at the simple facet.
The plastics aren’t of the most productive high quality – give them a knock they usually’re extra sonorous than they will have to be.
At all prices, even though, particularly the £950 Citroën asks for it, the panoramic sunroof will have to be have shyed away from. Not best did it rob the auto we examined of headroom up entrance, it rendered the rear appropriate just for youngsters.
Should I purchase one?
This is why it’s simple to be eager about small SUVs; there’s now not one available in the market that may best possible a class-leading – and even first rate – supermini. All are, somehow or some other and in various levels of gravity, unsuitable.
The flaw within the C3 Aircross is the mismatch between the joys symbol the auto outwardly promotes and its comparative loss of a laugh to pressure. SUVs, small or massive, exude ruggedness, and a way of life that trades a low riding place and a little bit gas economic system for the picture of a laugh. Unfortunately within the C3 Aircross, it’s a must to business so much quite a lot of MPG.
If you’re after a automotive that makes you seem like you’re having a laugh, get the C3 Aircross. If you’re after a automotive to if truth be told have a laugh whilst riding, you could need to glance a little bit additional.
Where Broadway, England On sale 1 November Price £18,400 Engine 1299cc, petrol Power 118bhp at 5500rpm Torque 151lb toes at 1750rpm Gearbox 6-spd handbook Kerb weight 1188kg Top pace 124mph Zero-60mph 10.4sec Fuel economic system 53.3mpg CO2 ranking 119g/km Rivals Kia Stonic, Renault Captur, Hyundai Kona
Citroën C3 Aircross UK 2017 review